Hürlimann H-658 XA or New Holland T 5040?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the New Holland T 5040: hydraulic flow and maximum permissible mass. On features, the Hürlimann H-658 XA is ahead on forward gears.

  • The New Holland T 5040 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 48% (21.5 L/min / 5.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The New Holland T 5040 suits road haulage better on this data: 24% (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-658 XA and New Holland T 5040, with the call on each
QuestionH-658 XAT 5040Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?56.4 kW (75.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”56.4 kW (75.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-658 XA and the T 5040.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-658 XA and the T 5040.
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”AheadThe New Holland T 5040 has 48% more hydraulic flow (21.5 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,692 kg (5,935 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”); the T 5040: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,660 kg (5,864 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”3,805 kg (8,389 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5040 is 43% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”AheadThe New Holland T 5040 has 24% higher maximum permissible mass (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”AheadThe Hürlimann H-658 XA has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland T 5040 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-658 XA and the T 5040.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-658 XA.
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2000–20042008–2012Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland T 5040 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland T 5040 has 48% more hydraulic flow (21.5 L/min / 5.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 5040 is 43% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 5040 has 24% higher maximum permissible mass (1,200 kg / 2,646 lb) than the Hürlimann H-658 XA (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-658 XA has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland T 5040 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland T 5040 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-658 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 658”); the T 5040: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland T5040”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources