Hürlimann H-655 XA or ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-655 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 45% (14.6 L/min / 3.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 67% (1,168 kg / 2,575 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-655 XA | 5213/5243-Turbo V/P | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 41.2 kW (55.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-655 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-655 XA and the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-655 XA and the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 46.8 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 32.2 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-655 XA has 45% more hydraulic flow (14.6 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 1,732 kg (3,818 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-655 XA has 67% more lift (1,168 kg / 2,575 lb) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 2,230 kg (4,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-655 XA is 17% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-655 XA has 350% more forward gears (35 gears) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-655 XA and the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-655 XA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-655 XA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-655 XA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 655” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 5213/5243-Turbo V/P” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2004 | 1990–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-655 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA has 45% more hydraulic flow (14.6 L/min / 3.9 gpm) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA has 67% more lift (1,168 kg / 2,575 lb) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA is 17% heavier (370 kg / 816 lb) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA has 350% more forward gears (35 gears) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 5213/5243-Turbo V/P does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hürlimann H-655 XA is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-655 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5213/5243-Turbo V/P has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources