Hürlimann H-6190 Master or URSUS 1934?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Hürlimann H-6190 Master suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-6190 Master | 1934 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 139 kW (186 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 140 kW (188 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-6190 Master and the 1934. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-6190 Master and the 1934. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.8 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6190 Master has 19% more lift (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 6,180 kg (13,625 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 1934. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 16Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 1934 (open data) | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6190 Master has 69% more forward gears (11 gears) than the URSUS 1934 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-6190 Master and the 1934. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6190 Master. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6190” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 1934” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–2001 | 2001–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-6190 Master has 19% more lift (1,400 kg / 3,086 lb) than the URSUS 1934 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-6190 Master has 69% more forward gears (11 gears) than the URSUS 1934 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 1934 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-6190 Master has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1934 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources