Hürlimann H-56 XA or New Holland 4135 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-56 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann H-56 XA suits road haulage better on this data: 30% (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) more maximum permissible mass.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-56 XA and New Holland 4135 (A), with the call on each
QuestionH-56 XA4135 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.4 kW (54.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-56 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-56 XA and the 4135 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-56 XA and the 4135 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”34.5 L/min (9.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”2,635 kg (5,809 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”3,850 kg (8,488 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe Hürlimann H-56 XA has 30% higher maximum permissible mass (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”YesTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”AheadThe Hürlimann H-56 XA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-56 XA and the 4135 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 56”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 4135”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20141996–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-56 XA is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-56 XA has 30% higher maximum permissible mass (1,150 kg / 2,535 lb) than the New Holland 4135 (A) (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-56 XA offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the New Holland 4135 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann H-56 XA is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-56 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 4135 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources