Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) or Lamborghini 950 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-496 Turbo (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 950 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 11% (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Lamborghini 950 DT suits road haulage better on this data: 60% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) and Lamborghini 950 DT, with the call on each
QuestionH-496 Turbo (A)950 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?69.8 kW (93.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”69.8 kW (93.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-496 Turbo (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 950 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-496 Turbo (A) and the 950 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-496 Turbo (A) and the 950 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?68.0 L/min (18.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”AheadThe Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) has 11% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,151 kg (6,947 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-496 Turbo (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”); the 950 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,860 kg (8,510 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”4,280 kg (9,436 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 950 DT is 11% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-496 Turbo (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”20 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-496 Turbo (A) and the 950 DT.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”AheadThe Lamborghini 950 DT has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-496 Turbo (A) and the 950 DT.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1984–19891995–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lamborghini 950 DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) has 11% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Lamborghini 950 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 950 DT is 11% heavier (420 kg / 926 lb) than the Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 950 DT has 60% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the Hürlimann H-496 Turbo (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 950 DT is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-496 Turbo (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 950 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-496 Turbo (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 496”); the 950 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Premium 950 DT A”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources