Hürlimann H-466 (A) or New Holland TL 70 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-466 (A) and New Holland TL 70 (A), with the call on each
QuestionH-466 (A)TL 70 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.4 kW (56.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”42.1 kW (56.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-466 (A) and the TL 70 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-466 (A) and the TL 70 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-466 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,294 kg (5,058 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”2,840 kg (6,261 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-466 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”); the TL 70 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,840 kg (6,261 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”4,150 kg (9,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TL 70 (A) is 46% heavier (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the Hürlimann H-466 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-466 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-466 (A) and the TL 70 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-466 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1983–19861998–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TL 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TL 70 (A) is 46% heavier (1,310 kg / 2,888 lb) than the Hürlimann H-466 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TL 70 (A) is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-466 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 466”); the TL 70 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TL70”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources