Hürlimann H-4105 Elite or Renault Temis 550?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-4105 Elite has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault Temis 550 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault Temis 550 suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (650 kg / 1,433 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-4105 Elite | Temis 550 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 75.1 kW (100.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-4105 Elite has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-4105 Elite and the Temis 550. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-4105 Elite and the Temis 550. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 56.0 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 55.7 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,760 kg (10,494 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 7,260 kg (16,006 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | AheadThe Renault Temis 550 has 53% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,740 kg (8,245 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 5,340 kg (11,773 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 550 is 43% heavier (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,450 kg (12,015 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | AheadThe Renault Temis 550 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 40Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-4105 Elite has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Renault Temis 550 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-4105 Elite and the Temis 550. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Temis 550. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 4105 Elite” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Témis 550X” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1995 | 2000–2003 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Temis 550 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Temis 550 has 53% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 550 is 43% heavier (1,600 kg / 3,527 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 550 has 12% higher maximum permissible mass (650 kg / 1,433 lb) than the Hürlimann H-4105 Elite (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-4105 Elite has 67% more forward gears (16 gears) than the Renault Temis 550 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Temis 550 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-4105 Elite has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Temis 550 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources