Hürlimann H-361 (A) or SAME Argon 60 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hürlimann H-361 (A) is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Hürlimann H-361 (A) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-361 (A) and SAME Argon 60 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionH-361 (A)Argon 60 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37.2 kW (49.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”37.2 kW (49.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-361 (A) and the Argon 60 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-361 (A) and the Argon 60 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.0 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-361 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,626 kg (5,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-361 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”); the Argon 60 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,425 kg (5,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-361 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-361 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”AheadThe Hürlimann H-361 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Argon 60 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-361 (A) and the Argon 60 (DT).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19971993–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Argon 60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-361 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the SAME Argon 60 (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The SAME Argon 60 (DT) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-361 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”); the Argon 60 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Argon 60”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources