Hürlimann H-361 (A) or Lamborghini 660 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-361 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 660 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-361 (A) and Lamborghini 660 (DT), with the call on each
QuestionH-361 (A)660 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”44.1 kW (59.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-361 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 660 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-361 (A) and the 660 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-361 (A) and the 660 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?—32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-361 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,626 kg (5,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”2,970 kg (6,548 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-361 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”); the 660 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,425 kg (5,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”2,280 kg (5,027 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-361 (A) and the 660 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-361 (A) and the 660 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-361 (A).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1986–19971986–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-361 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 660 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-361 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 361”); the 660 (DT): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 660 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources