Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" or Hürlimann H-362 (A)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann H-362 (A): three-point lift.
- The Hürlimann H-362 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 28% (470 kg / 1,036 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-358 "Prestige" | H-362 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.0 kW (51.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 37.9 kW (50.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige" and the H-362 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige" and the H-362 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 28.5 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-362 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 2,170 kg (4,784 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-362 (A) has 28% more lift (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,775 kg (6,118 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 2,580 kg (5,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-358 "Prestige". |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 15 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-358 "Prestige" and the H-362 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-362 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 362” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1989–1998 | 1989–1996 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann H-362 (A) has 28% more lift (470 kg / 1,036 lb) than the Hürlimann H-358 "Prestige" (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources