Hürlimann H-358.4 Club or Hürlimann H-656 XA?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann H-656 XA: hydraulic flow. It is also ahead on forward gears. On features, the Hürlimann H-358.4 Club is ahead on PTO speeds.

  • The Hürlimann H-358.4 Club suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 750 rpm.
  • The Hürlimann H-656 XA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 70% (19.3 L/min / 5.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-358.4 Club and Hürlimann H-656 XA, with the call on each
QuestionH-358.4 ClubH-656 XACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.4 kW (58.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”43.6 kW (58.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-358.4 Club and the H-656 XA.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-358.4 Club and the H-656 XA.
Which pumps more oil for implements?27.5 L/min (7.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”46.8 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”AheadThe Hürlimann H-656 XA has 70% more hydraulic flow (19.3 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-358.4 Club (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,581 kg (3,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”1,897 kg (4,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-358.4 Club: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”); the H-656 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,955 kg (6,515 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-358.4 Club is 14% heavier (355 kg / 783 lb) than the Hürlimann H-656 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,000 kg (11,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-358.4 Club.
Which has the wider choice of gears?30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”AheadThe Hürlimann H-656 XA has 50% more forward gears (15 gears) than the Hürlimann H-358.4 Club (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-358.4 Club and the H-656 XA.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/750/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”AheadThe Hürlimann H-358.4 Club offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-656 XA does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-358.4 Club and the H-656 XA.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1992–19991999–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-656 XA is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-656 XA has 70% more hydraulic flow (19.3 L/min / 5.1 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-358.4 Club (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-358.4 Club is 14% heavier (355 kg / 783 lb) than the Hürlimann H-656 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-656 XA has 50% more forward gears (15 gears) than the Hürlimann H-358.4 Club (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-358.4 Club offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-656 XA does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann H-656 XA is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-358.4 Club: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 358.4 Club”); the H-656 XA: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 656”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources