Hürlimann H-355 (A) or SAME Minitaurus 60?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Minitaurus 60: three-point lift.

  • The SAME Minitaurus 60 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (388 kg / 855 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-355 (A) and SAME Minitaurus 60, with the call on each
QuestionH-355 (A)Minitaurus 60Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.6 kW (47.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”35.4 kW (47.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the Minitaurus 60.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the Minitaurus 60.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-355 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,672 kg (3,687 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”2,060 kg (4,542 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”AheadThe SAME Minitaurus 60 has 23% more lift (388 kg / 855 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”2,190 kg (4,828 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Minitaurus 60 is 11% heavier (210 kg / 463 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the Minitaurus 60.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-355 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-355 (A).
Which drives on both axles?2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Minitaurus 60”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1982–19861978–1984EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Minitaurus 60 has 23% more lift (388 kg / 855 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Minitaurus 60 is 11% heavier (210 kg / 463 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources