Hürlimann H-355 (A) or J.I. Case 1290 (DT)?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the J.I. Case 1290 (DT) is ahead on top speed.
- The J.I. Case 1290 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-355 (A) | 1290 (DT) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.6 kW (47.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | 35.7 kW (47.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the 1290 (DT). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the 1290 (DT). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 28.4 L/min (7.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-355 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,672 kg (3,687 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 1290 (DT). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | 2,981 kg (6,572 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The J.I. Case 1290 (DT) is 51% heavier (1,001 kg / 2,207 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-355 (A) and the 1290 (DT). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-355 (A) and the 1290 (DT). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | AheadThe J.I. Case 1290 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-355 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 355” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case 1290” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1986 | 1980–1984 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The J.I. Case 1290 (DT) is 51% heavier (1,001 kg / 2,207 lb) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The J.I. Case 1290 (DT) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann H-355 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources