Hürlimann H-350 (A) or International Harvester 485?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | H-350 (A) | 485 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-350 (A) and the 485. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-350 (A) and the 485. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 46.9 L/min (12.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the H-350 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,410 kg (5,313 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 1,680 kg (3,704 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-350 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)”); the 485: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 485 is 29% heavier (570 kg / 1,257 lb) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-350 (A) and the 485. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-350 (A) and the 485. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | AheadThe International Harvester 485 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-350 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-350 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1982–1986 | 1981–1990 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 485 is 29% heavier (570 kg / 1,257 lb) than the Hürlimann H-350 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester 485 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann H-350 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Hürlimann H-350 (A) is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 485 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-350 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 485 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-350 (A): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 350 (A)”); the 485: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 485 (XL)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources