Hürlimann H-272 TA or Lamborghini 700 DT?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-272 TA and Lamborghini 700 DT, with the call on each
QuestionH-272 TA700 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?43.1 kW (57.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”43.1 kW (57.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-272 TA and the 700 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-272 TA and the 700 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.4 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”26.4 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”2,498 kg (5,507 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-272 TA: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”); the 700 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-272 TA is 12% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Lamborghini 700 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”4,600 kg (10,141 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”12 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-272 TA and the 700 DT.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-272 TA and the 700 DT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1989–19961989–1996EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann H-272 TA is 12% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Lamborghini 700 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-272 TA: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 372”); the 700 DT: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 700”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources