Hürlimann D-95 L/S or Kramer 450 Export?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann D-95 L/S: hydraulic flow.
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-95 L/S | 450 Export | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 29.6 kW (39.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 29.4 kW (39 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S and the 450 Export. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S and the 450 Export. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 31.0 L/min (8.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 55% more hydraulic flow (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,700 kg (3,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 450 Export. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,030 kg (4,475 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 2,650 kg (5,842 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-95 L/S. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-95 L/S. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 28 km/h (17.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 585/1090 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 450 Export. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-95 L/S. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 95 L/S” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer 450 Export” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1975–1977 | 1964–1967 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-95 L/S is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S has 55% more hydraulic flow (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Kramer 450 Export (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-95 L/S is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources