Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat or Renault 145-54 TX?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Renault 145-54 TX suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat and Renault 145-54 TX, with the call on each
QuestionD-550 Hydrostat145-54 TXCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat and the 145-54 TX.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat and the 145-54 TX.
Which pumps more oil for implements?52.0 L/min (13.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”41.1 L/min (10.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat has 27% more hydraulic flow (10.9 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Renault 145-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”8,850 kg (19,511 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Renault 145-54 TX has 205% more lift (5,950 kg / 13,118 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”5,655 kg (12,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-54 TX is 32% heavier (1,355 kg / 2,987 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) and the Renault 145-54 TX has 16 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat and the 145-54 TX.
Which is faster on the road?27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”AheadThe Renault 145-54 TX has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat and the 145-54 TX.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 145-54 TE/TA/TS/TX/TZ R7942”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?19741989–1990Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 145-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat has 27% more hydraulic flow (10.9 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Renault 145-54 TX (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX has 205% more lift (5,950 kg / 13,118 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX is 32% heavier (1,355 kg / 2,987 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 145-54 TX is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) and the Renault 145-54 TX has 16 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 145-54 TX has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources