Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat or Massey Ferguson MF 1134 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (6.5 L/min / 1.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 86% (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-550 Hydrostat | MF 1134 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 99.2 kW (133.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 99.4 kW (133.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat and the MF 1134 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat and the MF 1134 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 52.0 L/min (13.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 58.5 L/min (15.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 13% more hydraulic flow (6.5 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 5,400 kg (11,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 86% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 5,050 kg (11,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) is 17% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-550 Hydrostat and the MF 1134 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 12 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) and the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 12 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat and the MF 1134 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-550 Hydrostat. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 550 Hydrostat” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1134” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1974 | 1978–1990 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 13% more hydraulic flow (6.5 L/min / 1.7 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 86% more lift (2,500 kg / 5,512 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) is 17% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Hürlimann D-550 Hydrostat is stepless (CVT) and the Massey Ferguson 1134 (A) has 12 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-550 Hydrostat has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1134 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources