Hürlimann D-410 or John Deere 3010?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-410 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3010 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-410 | 3010 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-410 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3010 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-410 and the 3010. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-410 and the 3010. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410 Synchromatic” | 68.0 L/min (18.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | AheadThe John Deere 3010 has 89% more hydraulic flow (32.0 L/min / 8.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-410 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410 Synchromatic” | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-410 has 22% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the John Deere 3010 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410” | 3,160 kg (6,967 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-410 is 14% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the John Deere 3010 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-410 and the 3010. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410” | 7 to 8Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-410 and the 3010. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 22 km/h (13.7 mph) to 60 km/h (37.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | — | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D-410. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-410 and the 3010. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410”; Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 410 Synchromatic” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 3010” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1960–1964 | 1962–1964 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 3010 has 89% more hydraulic flow (32.0 L/min / 8.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-410 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-410 has 22% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the John Deere 3010 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-410 is 14% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the John Deere 3010 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-410 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3010 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources