Hürlimann D-310 (A) or John Deere 2950 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-310 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 2950 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 142% (51.1 L/min / 13.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The John Deere 2950 (A) suits road haulage better on this data: 20% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-310 (A) | 2950 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 62.5 kW (83.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | 62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-310 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-310 (A) and the 2950 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-310 (A) and the 2950 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | 87.1 L/min (23.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | AheadThe John Deere 2950 (A) has 142% more hydraulic flow (51.1 L/min / 13.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,450 kg (5,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 2950 (A). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,030 kg (6,680 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | 4,127 kg (9,098 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2950 (A) is 36% heavier (1,097 kg / 2,418 lb) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 5,980 kg (13,184 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-310 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | 8 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-310 (A) and the 2950 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | AheadThe John Deere 2950 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | — | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the 2950 (A). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-310 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 310” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 2950” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1975 | 1983–1988 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 2950 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 2950 (A) has 142% more hydraulic flow (51.1 L/min / 13.5 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2950 (A) is 36% heavier (1,097 kg / 2,418 lb) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2950 (A) has 20% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Hürlimann D-310 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 2950 (A) is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-310 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2950 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources