Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic or Massey Ferguson MF 590 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson 590 (A): hydraulic flow.

  • The Massey Ferguson 590 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 74% (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic and Massey Ferguson MF 590 (A), with the call on each
QuestionD-210 (A) SynchromaticMF 590 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?48.2 kW (64.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”47.4 kW (63.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-210 (A) Synchromatic and the MF 590 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-210 (A) Synchromatic and the MF 590 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 590 (A) has 74% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,640 kg (5,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”2,900 kg (6,393 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”3,290 kg (7,253 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 590 (A) is 15% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-210 (A) Synchromatic and the MF 590 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-210 (A) Synchromatic and the MF 590 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-210 (A) Synchromatic.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 210 (A)”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 590 & 590A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1972–19741976–1982EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 590 (A) has 74% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 590 (A) is 15% heavier (440 kg / 970 lb) than the Hürlimann D-210 (A) Synchromatic (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources