Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic or Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark-II?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-150 Synchromatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 65 Mark-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 77% (876 kg / 1,931 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic and Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark-II, with the call on each
QuestionD-150 SynchromaticMF 65 Mark-IICall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?42.6 kW (57.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”42.7 kW (57.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-150 Synchromatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 65 Mark-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-150 Synchromatic and the MF 65 Mark-II.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-150 Synchromatic and the MF 65 Mark-II.
Which pumps more oil for implements?—15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D-150 Synchromatic.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”1,134 kg (2,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”AheadThe Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 77% more lift (876 kg / 1,931 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,770 kg (6,107 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”2,075 kg (4,575 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic is 33% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-150 Synchromatic and the MF 65 Mark-II.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”6Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”AheadThe Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-150 Synchromatic and the MF 65 Mark-II.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”AheadThe Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”AheadThe Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-150 Synchromatic.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 Synchromatic”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 65 Mark II”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1969–19711961–1964Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 77% more lift (876 kg / 1,931 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic is 33% heavier (695 kg / 1,532 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 100% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Massey Ferguson 65 Mark-II does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Hürlimann D-150 Synchromatic is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-150 Synchromatic has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 65 Mark-II has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources