Hürlimann D-150 S or Renault 385 / R 77?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Hürlimann D-150S: hydraulic flow and three-point lift. It is also ahead on PTO speeds.
- The Hürlimann D-150S suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
- The Hürlimann D-150S suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 23% (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (350 kg / 772 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-150 S | 385 / R 77 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 39.1 kW (52.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 39.3 kW (52.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-150 S and the 385 / R 77. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-150 S and the 385 / R 77. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 32.0 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 26.0 L/min (6.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-150S has 23% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 385 / R 77 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-150S has 23% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Renault 385 / R 77 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,480 kg (5,467 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 2,590 kg (5,710 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-150 S and the 385 / R 77. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D-150 S and the 385 / R 77. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | AheadThe Hürlimann D-150S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 385 / R 77 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D-150 S and the 385 / R 77. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 150 S” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 385/R 77” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1966–1971 | 1963–1964 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann D-150S has 23% more hydraulic flow (6.0 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Renault 385 / R 77 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-150S has 23% more lift (350 kg / 772 lb) than the Renault 385 / R 77 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann D-150S offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Renault 385 / R 77 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources