Hürlimann D-120 or OLIVER 1450 (4 WD)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 22% (495 kg / 1,091 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) suits road haulage better on this data: 15% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D-120 | 1450 (4 WD) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.5 kW (65.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 48.6 kW (65.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D-120 and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D-120 and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 26.5 L/min (7.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D-120. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,400 kg (3,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 1,825 kg (4,023 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the D-120: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120”); the 1450 (4 WD): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,225 kg (4,905 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 2,720 kg (5,997 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is 22% heavier (495 kg / 1,091 lb) than the Hürlimann D-120 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D-120 and the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 7 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 1450 (4 WD). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 23 km/h (14.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has an independent PTO; the Hürlimann D-120’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450” | AheadThe OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-120 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1960–1964 | 1967–1969 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is 22% heavier (495 kg / 1,091 lb) than the Hürlimann D-120 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has 15% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the Hürlimann D-120 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) has an independent PTO; the Hürlimann D-120’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is available with four-wheel drive; the Hürlimann D-120 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The OLIVER 1450 (4 WD) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 1450 (4 WD) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the D-120: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 120”); the 1450 (4 WD): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Oliver 1450”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources