Hürlimann D 100 vs MASSEY-HARRIS 202
7 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (67%); they were not built in overlapping years (1946–1954; 1940–1942). The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.
Field by field
7 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | D 100 | 202 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 35.5 hp | 36.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Hürlimann D-100 | CONTINENTAL M-290 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.02 L | 4.75 L | +18% 202 |
| Maximum torque declared | 151 lb·ft · 205 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | Pedal operated dry single plate clutch | Pedal operated dry Borg & Beck single plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540 rpm | 540 rpm | — |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,902 lb · 1,770 kg | 6,499 lb · 2,948 kg | +67% 202 |
| Wheelbase declared | — | 89.0 in · 2,261 mm | — |
| Length declared | 107.1 in · 2,720 mm | 139.5 in · 3,543 mm | +30% 202 |
| Width declared | 59.1 in · 1,500 mm | 69.0 in · 1,753 mm | +17% 202 |
| Height declared | 57.1 in · 1,450 mm | 59.3 in · 1,505 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | — | 12.8 in · 324 mm | — |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 9.2 ft · 2.80 m | — | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 42.3 qt · 40 L | 120.5 qt · 114.0 L | +185% 202 |
Hürlimann D 100 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann D 100”
MASSEY-HARRIS 202 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Massey-Harris Massey-Harris 202”