Hürlimann 95 XT or ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 56% (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann 95 XT and ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009), with the call on each
Question95 XT9641 (2007-2009)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?66.9 kW (89.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 95 XT and the 9641 (2007-2009).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 95 XT and the 9641 (2007-2009).
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”69.6 L/min (18.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”AheadThe ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) has 56% more hydraulic flow (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,478 kg (5,463 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”4,935 kg (10,880 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 95 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”); the 9641 (2007-2009): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,120 kg (9,083 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”4,570 kg (10,075 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) is 11% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”7,580 kg (16,711 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”AheadThe Hürlimann 95 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 95 XT and the 9641 (2007-2009).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 95 XT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–2007–2009EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) has 56% more hydraulic flow (25.1 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) is 11% heavier (450 kg / 992 lb) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann 95 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the ZETOR 9641 (2007-2009) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9641 (2007-2009) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 95 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”); the 9641 (2007-2009): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 9641 (2007-2009)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources