Hürlimann 95 XT or Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 95 XT | MF 6140 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 66.9 kW (89.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 95 XT and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 95 XT and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 51.5 L/min (13.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,478 kg (5,463 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 3,487 kg (7,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 95 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”); the MF 6140 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,120 kg (9,083 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 3,660 kg (8,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 95 XT is 13% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | AheadThe Hürlimann 95 XT has 41% more forward gears (13 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 95 XT and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 95 XT and the MF 6140 (A). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004– | 1995–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 95 XT is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 16% more hydraulic flow (7.0 L/min / 1.8 gpm) than the Hürlimann 95 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 95 XT is 13% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 95 XT has 41% more forward gears (13 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 95 XT is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 95 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 95 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 95”); the MF 6140 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources