Hürlimann 909 XT or New Holland 7635 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 909 XT | 7635 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 69.8 kW (93.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 69.9 kW (93.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 909 XT and the 7635 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 909 XT and the 7635 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 61.0 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,550 kg (5,622 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 4,200 kg (9,259 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 909 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”); the 7635 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 3,400 kg (7,496 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 909 XT is 26% heavier (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the New Holland 7635 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 909 XT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45 to 60Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | AheadThe Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland 7635 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 909 XT and the 7635 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 909 XT. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1995–2004 | 1996–1998 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Hürlimann 909 XT is 26% heavier (900 kg / 1,984 lb) than the New Holland 7635 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 909 XT has 88% more forward gears (21 gears) than the New Holland 7635 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 909 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 909 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 909”); the 7635 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 7635”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources