Hürlimann 110 XT or SAME Antares 110?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the SAME Antares 110: hydraulic flow.
- The SAME Antares 110 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 49% (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 110 XT | Antares 110 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 74.6 kW (100.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 75.8 kW (101.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 110 XT and the Antares 110. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 110 XT and the Antares 110. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 41.5 L/min (11.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 61.7 L/min (16.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | AheadThe SAME Antares 110 has 49% more hydraulic flow (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann 110 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,997 kg (8,813 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 5,190 kg (11,442 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 110 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110”); the Antares 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,650 kg (10,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 4,855 kg (10,703 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 24 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 110 XT and the Antares 110. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 110 XT and the Antares 110. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005– | 1991–1996 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann 110 XT is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The SAME Antares 110 has 49% more hydraulic flow (20.2 L/min / 5.3 gpm) than the Hürlimann 110 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann 110 XT is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 110 XT: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 110”); the Antares 110: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Antares 110”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources