Hermann Lanz D 527 vs International Harvester Farmall 140
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the D 527 and the Farmall 140 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | D 527 | Farmall 140 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 23.6 hp | 23.7 hp | — |
| Engine declared | MWM D 208-2 | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-123 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 1.49 L | 2.01 L | +35% Farmall 140 |
| Maximum torque declared | — | 106 lb·ft · 144 N·m | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 12.4–15.5 mph · 20–25 km/h | 12.4 mph · 20 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Maintenance-free double clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | — | 4.6 gpm · 17.4 L/min | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 3,086 lb · 1,400 kg | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 570/1100 rpm | 541 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 3,704 lb · 1,680 kg | 3,000 lb · 1,361 kg | +23% D 527 |
| Wheelbase declared | 76.0 in · 1,930 mm | 71.0 in · 1,803 mm | +7% D 527 |
| Length declared | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | 107.0 in · 2,718 mm | +18% D 527 |
| Width declared | 59.8 in · 1,520 mm | 56.0 in · 1,422 mm | +7% D 527 |
| Height declared | 49.2 in · 1,250 mm | 65.5 in · 1,664 mm | +33% Farmall 140 |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.4 in · 340 mm | 22.3 in · 566 mm | +66% Farmall 140 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | — | 8.4 ft · 2.55 m | — |
| Fuel tank declared | 37.0 qt · 35 L | 44.0 qt · 41.6 L | +19% Farmall 140 |
Hermann Lanz D 527 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D527”
International Harvester Farmall 140 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Farmall Farmall 140”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick Farmall Super-A 1”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IHC Farmall 140”