Hermann Lanz D 260 A vs Lamborghini R 683 (DT)

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1971–1979

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1982–1985

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the D 260 A and the R 683 (DT) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Hermann Lanz D 260 A and Lamborghini R 683 (DT), field by field
Field	D 260 A	R 683 (DT)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	58.9 hp	59.1 hp	—
Engine declared	MWM D 225-4 ( 7/1971 bis 3/1976 )	SAME 1.053 P	differs
Displacement declared	—	3.12 L	—
Maximum torque declared	166 lb·ft · 226 N·m	161 lb·ft · 218 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	15.8 mph · 25.4 km/h	15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs	Dry VALEO double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	8.2 gpm · 31.0 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	4,299–5,291 lb · 1,950–2,400 kg	5,512 lb · 2,500 kg	differs
Rear PTO speeds declared	552/1000 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	6,658 lb · 3,020 kg	4,938 lb · 2,240 kg	+35% D 260 A
Maximum permissible mass declared	9,700 lb · 4,400 kg	—	—
Wheelbase declared	92.5 in · 2,350 mm	81.4 in · 2,068 mm	+14% D 260 A
Length declared	141.7 in · 3,600 mm	132.4 in · 3,364 mm	+7% D 260 A
Width declared	76.0 in · 1,930 mm	67.9 in · 1,725 mm	+12% D 260 A
Height declared	89.4 in · 2,270 mm	92.1 in · 2,340 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	15.7 in · 400 mm	20.5 in · 520 mm	+30% R 683 (DT)
Turning radius, braked declared	18.0 ft · 5.50 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	74.0 qt · 70 L	63.4 qt · 60.0 L	+17% D 260 A

Source

Source