HELA L 25 or John Deere General Purpose?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the L 25 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the General Purpose has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The HELA L 25 suits road haulage better on this data: 177% (12.4 km/h / 7.7 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | L 25 | General Purpose | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 18.2 kW (24.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 18.6 kW (24.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the L 25 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the General Purpose has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 1,935 kg (4,266 lb) to 2,234 kg (4,925 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 4Traktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 3Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): fewer than 2 gears apart. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the L 25 and the General Purpose. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.4 km/h (12.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 7.0 km/h (4.3 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | AheadThe HELA L 25 has 177% more top speed (12.4 km/h / 7.7 mph) than the John Deere General Purpose (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 520 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the General Purpose. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the L 25. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA L 25 Holzgas” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere Modell GP” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1942–1944 | 1928–1935 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The HELA L 25 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The HELA L 25 has 177% more top speed (12.4 km/h / 7.7 mph) than the John Deere General Purpose (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The HELA L 25 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): fewer than 2 gears apart.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the L 25 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the General Purpose has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources