HELA D 38 or HELA D 39?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the D 38 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 39 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | D 38 | D 39 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 16.1 kW (21.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 16.1 kW (21.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 38 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 39 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,600 kg (3,527 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 1,400 kg (3,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The HELA D 38 is 14% heavier (200 kg / 441 lb) than the HELA D 39 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 5Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 4Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 19.4 km/h (12.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 550 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 38. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the D 38 and the D 39. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D38 (1938)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D39 (1939)” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1938 | 1939 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The HELA D 38 is 14% heavier (200 kg / 441 lb) than the HELA D 39 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the D 38 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 39 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources