Güldner G 50 (Gotland) or WHITE 2-50?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 50 (Gotland) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 50 (Gotland) | 2-50 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 35.1 kW (47.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 50 (Gotland) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 50 (Gotland) and the 2-50. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 50 (Gotland) and the 2-50. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 22.7 L/min (6.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 952 kg (2,099 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the G 50 (Gotland). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,680 kg (5,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 1,859 kg (4,098 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 50 (Gotland) is 44% heavier (821 kg / 1,810 lb) than the WHITE 2-50 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the G 50 (Gotland) and the 2-50. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 50 (Gotland) and the 2-50. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 572/1120 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the G 50 (Gotland). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the G 50 (Gotland). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 50 Gotland” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-50” | AheadThe WHITE 2-50 is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 50 (Gotland) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1962 | 1976–1980 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-50 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Güldner G 50 (Gotland) is 44% heavier (821 kg / 1,810 lb) than the WHITE 2-50 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-50 is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 50 (Gotland) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- The WHITE 2-50 is newer: production began 14 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 50 (Gotland) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-50 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources