Güldner G 40 W or International Harvester International 340?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 40 W has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The International Harvester International 340 suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (5.6 km/h / 3.5 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 40 W | International 340 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 27.8 kW (37.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 27.9 kW (37.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 40 W has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 40 W and the International 340. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 40 W and the International 340. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 36.1 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 40 W. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,490.000 kg (3,285 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the International 340. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,675 kg (3,693 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 2,356 kg (5,194 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester International 340 is 41% heavier (681 kg / 1,501 lb) than the Güldner G 40W (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the G 40 W and the International 340. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 5 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the International 340. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 19.4 km/h (12.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | AheadThe International Harvester International 340 has 29% more top speed (5.6 km/h / 3.5 mph) than the Güldner G 40W (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1150 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | AheadThe Güldner G 40W has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch). |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 40W” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 340” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1965–1969 | 1958–1963 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 40W is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester International 340 is 41% heavier (681 kg / 1,501 lb) than the Güldner G 40W (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The International Harvester International 340 has 29% more top speed (5.6 km/h / 3.5 mph) than the Güldner G 40W (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Güldner G 40W has an independent PTO; the International Harvester International 340’s is dependent (stops with the clutch).
- The Güldner G 40W is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 40 W has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the International 340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources