Güldner G 35 A (S) or J.I. Case 440?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Güldner G 35 A (S) is ahead on PTO speeds and drive.

  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 53% (750 kg / 1,653 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Güldner G 35 A (S) and J.I. Case 440, with the call on each
QuestionG 35 A (S)440Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?24.3 kW (33 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”24.3 kW (32.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 440”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 35 A (S) and the 440.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 35 A (S) and the 440.
Which pumps more oil for implements?32.2 L/min (8.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 440”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 35 A (S).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 440.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,165 kg (4,773 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”1,415 kg (3,120 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 440”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 35 A (S) is 53% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the J.I. Case 440 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 440.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”4 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Case 440”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 35 A (S) and the 440.
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case 440”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case 440”AheadThe Güldner G 35 A (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 440 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case 440”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35A”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case 440”AheadThe Güldner G 35 A (S) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 440 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19691960–1969Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 35 A (S) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) is 53% heavier (750 kg / 1,653 lb) than the J.I. Case 440 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the J.I. Case 440 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) is available with four-wheel drive; the J.I. Case 440 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Güldner G 35 A (S) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources