Güldner G 35 (S) or ZETOR 3511/3545?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3511/3545 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Güldner G 35 (S) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 55% (550 kg / 1,213 lb) more three-point lift.
- The ZETOR 3511/3545 suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 35 (S) | 3511/3545 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 25.7 kW (34.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3511/3545 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the 3511/3545. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the 3511/3545. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 35 (S). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 1,000 kg (2,205 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | AheadThe Güldner G 35 (S) has 55% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the ZETOR 3511/3545 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,895 kg (4,178 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 1,530 kg (3,373 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 35 (S) is 24% heavier (365 kg / 805 lb) than the ZETOR 3511/3545 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 3511/3545. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 35 (S) and the 3511/3545. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | AheadThe ZETOR 3511/3545 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | AheadThe Güldner G 35 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 3511/3545 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 3511” | AheadThe ZETOR 3511/3545 is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 35 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1967–1969 | 1967–1972 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Güldner G 35 (S) has 55% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the ZETOR 3511/3545 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Güldner G 35 (S) is 24% heavier (365 kg / 805 lb) than the ZETOR 3511/3545 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The ZETOR 3511/3545 has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Güldner G 35 (S) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the ZETOR 3511/3545 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The ZETOR 3511/3545 is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 35 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 3511/3545 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources