Güldner G 35 (S) or Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 350 / 350 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 13% (250 kg / 551 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 35 (S) | Super 350 / 350 V | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 350 / 350 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 1,500 kg (3,307 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the G 35 (S): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”); the Super 350 / 350 V: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,895 kg (4,178 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 2,145 kg (4,729 lb) to 2,245 kg (4,949 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V is 13% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 35 (S). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 615/1230 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super 350 / 350 V. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V” | AheadThe Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 35 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources). |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1967–1969 | 1967–1972 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V is 13% heavier (250 kg / 551 lb) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V is available with four-wheel drive; the Güldner G 35 (S) is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Super 350 / 350 V has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the G 35 (S): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”); the Super 350 / 350 V: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Super 350 / 350 V”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources