Güldner G 35 (S) or Hermann Lanz D 634 L?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 19% (300 kg / 661 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Güldner G 35 (S) and Hermann Lanz D 634 L, with the call on each
QuestionG 35 (S)D 634 LCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”25.6 kW (34.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the D 634 L.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the D 634 L.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 35 (S) and the D 634 L.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,550 kg (3,417 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”1,850 kg (4,079 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”AheadThe Hermann Lanz D 634 L has 19% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?1,895 kg (4,178 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”1,780 kg (3,924 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,200 kg (7,055 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the D 634 L.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”8 to 10Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 35 (S).
Which is faster on the road?20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”AheadThe Hermann Lanz D 634 L has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”545/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the D 634 L.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”independentTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 35”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “HELA D 634 L (D 635 L)”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1967–19691977–1980Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hermann Lanz D 634 L is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L has 19% more lift (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Güldner G 35 (S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hermann Lanz D 634 L is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the G 35 (S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 634 L has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources