Güldner G 25 or Kramer KB 25 L?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Güldner G 25 is ahead on forward gears.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | G 25 | KB 25 L | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 16.2 kW (22 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 16.2 kW (22 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the G 25 and the KB 25 L. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the G 25 and the KB 25 L. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 16.0 L/min (4.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the G 25. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,320 kg (2,910 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 720 kg (1,587 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the G 25: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”); the KB 25 L: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 1,770 kg (3,902 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 1,455 kg (3,208 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 25 is 22% heavier (315 kg / 694 lb) than the Kramer KB 25L (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the KB 25 L. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 5Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | AheadThe Güldner G 25 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Kramer KB 25L (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the G 25 and the KB 25 L. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 20 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1050 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 586 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the KB 25 L. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the G 25 and the KB 25 L. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1963–1969 | 1954–1955 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner G 25 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Güldner G 25 is 22% heavier (315 kg / 694 lb) than the Kramer KB 25L (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Güldner G 25 has 60% more forward gears (3 gears) than the Kramer KB 25L (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Güldner G 25 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the G 25: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner G 25”); the KB 25 L: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Kramer KB 25 L”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources