Güldner A 30 or Hanomag R 28 N?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Hanomag R 28N is ahead on forward gears.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | A 30 | R 28 N | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 19.9 kW (27 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 19.9 kW (27 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the A 30 and the R 28 N. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the A 30 and the R 28 N. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 12.0 L/min (3.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the A 30. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the A 30 and the R 28 N. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,040 kg (4,497 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 1,740 kg (3,836 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Güldner A 30 is 17% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Hanomag R 28N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 2,150 kg (4,740 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the A 30. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 4Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 10Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | AheadThe Hanomag R 28N has 150% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Güldner A 30 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the A 30 and the R 28 N. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 18 km/h (11.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 16.8 km/h (10.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 1430Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the R 28 N. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the A 30 and the R 28 N. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A 30” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 28 N” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1941–1942 | 1951–1953 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hanomag R 28N is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Güldner A 30 is 17% heavier (300 kg / 661 lb) than the Hanomag R 28N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Hanomag R 28N has 150% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Güldner A 30 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Hanomag R 28N is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources