Güldner A 3 KTA (Burgund-T) vs Massey Ferguson MF 25

12 material differences

Tractor one

1962–1965

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1961–1963

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the A 3 KTA (Burgund-T) and the MF 25 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

12 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Güldner A 3 KTA (Burgund-T) and Massey Ferguson MF 25, field by field
Field	A 3 KTA (Burgund-T)	MF 25	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	24.5 hp	24.7 hp	—
Engine declared	Güldner 3 LKA	Perkins A 4.107	differs
Displacement declared	1.32 L	1.75 L	+33% MF 25
Maximum torque declared	59 lb·ft · 79 N·m	74 lb·ft · 100 N·m	+27% MF 25
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.2 mph · 19.7 km/h	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs	Pedal operated dry air-cooled MF double clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	2.5 gpm · 9.6 L/min	—
Pressure declared	2,134 psi · 147 bar	1,991 psi · 137 bar	+7% A 3 KTA (Burgund-T)
Three-point lift at ends declared	1,984 lb · 900 kg	2,293 lb · 1,040 kg	+16% MF 25
Rear PTO speeds declared	546 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,197 lb · 1,450 kg	3,241 lb · 1,470 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	78.7 in · 2,000 mm	72.0 in · 1,830 mm	+9% A 3 KTA (Burgund-T)
Length declared	133.1 in · 3,380 mm	114.6 in · 2,910 mm	+16% A 3 KTA (Burgund-T)
Width declared	59.8 in · 1,520 mm	63.0 in · 1,600 mm	+5% MF 25
Height declared	61.8 in · 1,570 mm	55.1 in · 1,400 mm	+12% A 3 KTA (Burgund-T)
Ground clearance declared	—	13.4 in · 340 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	9.2 ft · 2.80 m	9.0 ft · 2.75 m	—
Fuel tank declared	33.8 qt · 32 L	47.6 qt · 45 L	+41% MF 25

Source

Source