Güldner A 3 K Burgund vs Steyr 188

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1959–1962

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1960–1966

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the A 3 K Burgund and the 188 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Güldner A 3 K Burgund and Steyr 188, field by field
Field	A 3 K Burgund	188	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	24.5 hp	27.6 hp	+13% 188
Engine declared	Güldner 3 LKN	Steyr WD-209	differs
Displacement declared	1.32 L	1.99 L	+51% 188
Maximum torque declared	—	87 lb·ft · 118 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	11.6 mph · 18.6 km/h	18.6 mph · 30 km/h	+61% 188
Clutch declared	Pedal operated dry double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs	Pedal-operated dry Fichtel & Sachs single-disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Pressure declared	—	2,134 psi · 147 bar	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	1,984 lb · 900 kg	2,425 lb · 1,100 kg	+22% 188
Rear PTO speeds declared	546 rpm	540 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	3,230 lb · 1,465 kg	3,064 lb · 1,390 kg	+5% A 3 K Burgund
Wheelbase declared	74.3 in · 1,886 mm	72.8 in · 1,850 mm	—
Length declared	123.6 in · 3,140 mm	124.4 in · 3,160 mm	—
Width declared	60.0 in · 1,524 mm	64.7 in · 1,644 mm	+8% 188
Height declared	60.6 in · 1,540 mm	57.1 in · 1,450 mm	+6% A 3 K Burgund
Ground clearance declared	14.8 in · 376 mm	17.3 in · 440 mm	+17% 188
Turning radius, braked declared	8.7 ft · 2.65 m	9.7 ft · 2.95 m	+11% 188
Fuel tank declared	—	42.3 qt · 40 L	—

Source

Source