Güldner A 28 vs International Harvester Farmall H/HV

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1946–1950

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1939–1953

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the A 28 and the Farmall H/HV → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Güldner A 28 and International Harvester Farmall H/HV, field by field
Field	A 28	Farmall H/HV	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	27.6 hp	25.6 hp	+8% A 28
Engine declared	Güldner 2F	INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER C-153	differs
Displacement declared	2.60 L	2.49 L	—
Maximum torque declared	110 lb·ft · 150 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	16.2 mph · 26 km/h	+30% Farmall H/HV
Clutch declared	Single-plate dry clutch	Pedal operated dry Rockford single disc clutch	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	541 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	4,023 lb · 1,825 kg	3,726 lb · 1,690 kg	+8% A 28
Wheelbase declared	70.5 in · 1,790 mm	88.5 in · 2,248 mm	+26% Farmall H/HV
Length declared	115.0 in · 2,920 mm	125.2 in · 3,181 mm	+9% Farmall H/HV
Width declared	64.6 in · 1,640 mm	75.0 in · 1,905 mm	+16% Farmall H/HV
Height declared	66.1 in · 1,680 mm	74.0 in · 1,880 mm	+12% Farmall H/HV
Ground clearance declared	13.0 in · 330 mm	24.6 in · 625 mm	+89% Farmall H/HV
Turning radius, braked declared	—	8.1 ft · 2.46 m	—
Fuel tank declared	44.4 qt · 42 L	50.0 qt · 47.3 L	+13% Farmall H/HV

Source

Source