Fordson E 27 N-D or MAN AS 250?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AS 250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The MAN AS 250 suits road haulage better on this data: 29% (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fordson E 27 N-D and MAN AS 250, with the call on each
QuestionE 27 N-DAS 250Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”36.6 kW (49.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AS 250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which pumps more oil for implements?——No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,473 kg (3,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the AS 250.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,367 kg (5,218 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”3,400 kg (7,496 lb) to 4,060 kg (8,951 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The MAN AS 250 is 44% heavier (1,033 kg / 2,277 lb) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which has the wider choice of gears?3Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”5Traktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”AheadThe MAN AS 250 has 67% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which is faster on the road?15.5 km/h (9.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”AheadThe MAN AS 250 has 29% more top speed (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?574 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”545Traktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the E 27 N-D and the AS 250.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “MAN AS 250”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1948–19521938–1946Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fordson E 27 N-D is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The MAN AS 250 is 44% heavier (1,033 kg / 2,277 lb) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The MAN AS 250 has 67% more forward gears (2 gears) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The MAN AS 250 has 29% more top speed (4.5 km/h / 2.8 mph) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Fordson E 27 N-D is newer: production began 10 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the AS 250 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources