Fordson E 27 N-D or Lanz D 1500?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 1500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fordson E 27 N-D suits road haulage better on this data: 107% (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | E 27 N-D | D 1500 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 36.6 kW (49.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 1500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,473 kg (3,247 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the D 1500. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,367 kg (5,218 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 3,600 kg (7,937 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Lanz D 1500 is 52% heavier (1,233 kg / 2,718 lb) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 3Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 3Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 15.5 km/h (9.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 7.5 km/h (4.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | AheadThe Fordson E 27 N-D has 107% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Lanz D 1500 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 574 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 750 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the E 27 N-D. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the E 27 N-D and the D 1500. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson Major-Diesel (E27N)” | 2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lanz D 1500” | EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1948–1952 | 1937–1940 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fordson E 27 N-D is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Lanz D 1500 is 52% heavier (1,233 kg / 2,718 lb) than the Fordson E 27 N-D (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fordson E 27 N-D has 107% more top speed (8.0 km/h / 5.0 mph) than the Lanz D 1500 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Fordson E 27 N-D is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the E 27 N-D has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the D 1500 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources