Fordson County Super IV or International Harvester 544?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Super IV has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The International Harvester 544 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 103% (23.0 L/min / 6.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The Fordson County Super IV suits heavy draft work (ploughing, cultivating) better on this data: 26% (592 kg / 1,305 lb) heavier and four-wheel drive.
  • The International Harvester 544 suits road haulage better on this data: 50% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Fordson County Super IV and International Harvester 544, with the call on each
QuestionSuper IV544Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Super IV has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Super IV and the 544.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Super IV and the 544.
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.4 L/min (5.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”45.4 L/min (12.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”AheadThe International Harvester 544 has 103% more hydraulic flow (23.0 L/min / 6.1 gpm) than the Fordson County Super IV (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,200 kg (2,646 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 544.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,850 kg (6,283 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”2,258 kg (4,978 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fordson County Super IV is 26% heavier (592 kg / 1,305 lb) than the International Harvester 544 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Super IV and the 544.
Which has the wider choice of gears?6 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Fordson County Super IV has 6 forward gears and the International Harvester 544 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Super IV and the 544.
Which is faster on the road?20.0 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”AheadThe International Harvester 544 has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fordson County Super IV (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”AheadThe International Harvester 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fordson County Super IV does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Super IV.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fordson County Super IV”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 544”AheadThe Fordson County Super IV is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 544 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1960–19641968–1973Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 544 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The International Harvester 544 has 103% more hydraulic flow (23.0 L/min / 6.1 gpm) than the Fordson County Super IV (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Fordson County Super IV is 26% heavier (592 kg / 1,305 lb) than the International Harvester 544 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 544 has 50% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Fordson County Super IV (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The International Harvester 544 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Fordson County Super IV does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Fordson County Super IV is available with four-wheel drive; the International Harvester 544 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The International Harvester 544 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Fordson County Super IV has 6 forward gears and the International Harvester 544 is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Super IV has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 544 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources