Ford TW-30 (A) or International Harvester 4166?
Which should you choose?
On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level. On features, the Ford TW-30 (A) is ahead on forward gears.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TW-30 (A) | 4166 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 117.1 kW (157.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 113.9 kW (152.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TW-30 (A) and the 4166. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TW-30 (A) and the 4166. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 62.5 L/min (16.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the TW-30 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 2,721 kg (5,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the TW-30 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30”); the 4166: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,634 kg (14,625 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 7,405 kg (16,325 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The International Harvester 4166 is 12% heavier (771 kg / 1,700 lb) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,990 kg (19,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 4166. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 14Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 8Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | AheadThe Ford TW-30 (A) has 75% more forward gears (6 gears) than the International Harvester 4166 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TW-30 (A) and the 4166. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 4166. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1983 | 1972–1976 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford TW-30 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The International Harvester 4166 is 12% heavier (771 kg / 1,700 lb) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Ford TW-30 (A) has 75% more forward gears (6 gears) than the International Harvester 4166 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Ford TW-30 (A) is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the TW-30 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30”); the 4166: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IHC 4166”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources