Ford TW-20 (A) or Massey Ferguson MF 2725?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TW-20 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2725 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 2725 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 96% (3,540 kg / 7,804 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Massey Ferguson 2725 suits road haulage better on this data: 17% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TW-20 (A) | MF 2725 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 107.4 kW (144.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 108.2 kW (145.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW-20 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2725 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TW-20 (A) and the MF 2725. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TW-20 (A) and the MF 2725. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 60.6 L/min (16.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 2725. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,680 kg (8,113 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 7,220 kg (15,917 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 2725 has 96% more lift (3,540 kg / 7,804 lb) than the Ford TW-20 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,828 kg (12,849 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 6,100 kg (13,448 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 8,165 kg (18,001 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 14 to 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TW-20 (A) and the MF 2725. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 35 km/h (21.7 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 2725 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford TW-20 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 20” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 2725” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1979–1983 | 1985–1987 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 2725 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 2725 has 96% more lift (3,540 kg / 7,804 lb) than the Ford TW-20 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 2725 has 17% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Ford TW-20 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson 2725 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW-20 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 2725 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources