Ford TW 15 or Massey Ferguson MF 1132?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TW 15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1132 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford TW 15 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 63% (1,756 kg / 3,871 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | TW 15 | MF 1132 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 97.1 kW (130.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 97.9 kW (131.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW 15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1132 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TW 15 and the MF 1132. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TW 15 and the MF 1132. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 45.0 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the TW 15. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,556 kg (10,044 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | AheadThe Ford TW 15 has 63% more lift (1,756 kg / 3,871 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1132 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,085 kg (13,415 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 5,860 kg (12,919 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the TW 15. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TW 15. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 15” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 1132” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1983–1989 | 1977–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Ford TW 15 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford TW 15 has 63% more lift (1,756 kg / 3,871 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 1132 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Ford TW 15 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TW 15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 1132 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources